Animals and Society Institute to Expand and Relocate

In case you do not receive email updates from the Animals and Society Institute, herewith is the most recent notice of ASI’s forthcoming changes.

ASI Expands to Europe, Relocates HQ

The Animals and Society Institute is pleased to announce that we
are establishing a European branch and moving our U.S.
headquarters from Baltimore, Maryland, to Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Ken Shapiro will remain as executive director, as well as editor
of our two academic journals (Society and Animals and the Journal
of Applied Animal Welfare Science
) and the Human-Animal Studies
book series. He will continue to oversee the Human-Animal Studies
program and the development and publication of ASI’s policy
papers series.

Current ASI board chair Bee Friedlander, an attorney and a
founding member of the State Bar of Michigan Animal Law
Section, will become managing director at the new Michigan
location in April.

Kim W. Stallwood will become the ASI’s European director upon his
relocation to England later this year. His work in developing The
Animals’ Platform, a blueprint for incorporating animal
protection issues into politics, will be continued in the U.K.
and European Union.

Jill Howard Church will continue as communications director as
well as the coordinator of the annual International Compassionate
Living Festival, which the ASI co-produces with the Culture and
Animals Foundation.

“We are very pleased to be expanding our programs and influence
to Europe while we continue our successful U.S. operations,” said
Shapiro. “This new configuration gives us even more opportunities
to play an important role in the animal protection movement
worldwide.”

Posted in Animal Rights, Organising | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Status of Fur

No wonder American journalism is in trouble if reporters like Robin Givhan, Washington Post fashion editor who won the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for Criticism for (“witty, closely observed essays that transform fashion criticism into cultural criticism”) writes such inaccurate drivel as

All consumers negotiate some sort of moral stance on animal life. A few take the position that no animal should suffer in their name and they eat brown rice and broccoli, skip putting honey in their tea, wear canvas shoes and shun products that have been tested on animals. These are people who refuse to swat flies but, rather, try to graciously usher them to the nearest open window.

But she got two things right. First, the only reason to wear fur is for its elitist status.

The wearer knows that it was her reward for a promotion or for running a marathon or putting the kid through college. It’s not just a coat that’s being purchased — it’s everything that the coat stands for. It doesn’t matter if the fur is as garish as a Ferrari or as ostentatious as a Hummer. It doesn’t matter if it marks the wearer as an arriviste. That, after all, is often the point.

The second thing is this,

Until anti-fur groups find a way to alter that [elite status] message, the fur business will continue to thrive.

But isn’t that what we’ve been trying to do for decades? To make fur unfashionable? It’s succeeded with some but not with others. Givhan is partially correct. And, why we, the animal rights movement, is only partially correct, too. In other words, we need to expand the frame of the anti-fur campaign from one of optional cruelty-free lifestyle choice to also include the arena of public policy and legislation. Yes, keep the publicity stunts going.

But what keeps the Grumpy Vegan optimistic on the anti-fur campaign is such initiatives as HSUS’s pressuring the Federal Trade Commission to enforce the Fur Products Labeling Act against 14 major retailers and designers concerning false advertising and false labeling of fur garments.

Fashion is fickle and unenforceable. Legislation mandates behavior and is enforceable.

Here lies the challenge of the animal rights movement.

Posted in Moaning | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bull Charges Man

Meanwhile, at the Rugby cattlemarket …….

A man suffered a serious head injury after being knocked over by a bull that had escaped from Rugby cattle market. The bull ran through the town, at one point getting onto a platform at Rugby station, forcing it to close. Police marksmen were put on standby to shoot the animal while farmers from the cattle market ran after it and eventually brought it under control. The 43-year-old man was airlift to the University Hospital Coventry where he is in intensive care. The bull escaped from a holding pen at the cattle market just after midday and ran off along Railway Terrace towards the railway station. The bull got onto an area of the platform that is not used by customers or staff Virgin Trains. A number of people tried to contain the animal as it ran along the road. The bull then went along Railway Terrace into Murray Road and Abbey Street where further attempts were made to control the animal in the railway station car park. The station was closed for a short period as the bull got on to one of the platforms before escaping back onto Abbey Street. The animal then ran back towards the market where it was herded back into a pen. It had escaped for about 30 minutes.

Posted in Moaning | Tagged | Leave a comment

Conservative David Cameron, MP, Stag Killer

Can you spot the upper class twit? The elitist Bullingdon Club posing in their expensive drag. Cameron is in the top row, second from left.
If it isn’t bad enough that David Cameron MP, the British Conservative Party leader, claims to be an environmentalist, but was caught cycling to Parliament from his home followed by a limousine transporting his briefcase; poses as man of the people, but reportedly smoked cannabis — perhaps not such a big deal in this day and age — but at the excusive school Eton and, while at Oxford University, belonged to the elite Bullingdon Club, whose members wore coats costing more than 1,000 UK pounds each and trashed restaurants in a drunken stupor; if all this wasn’t bad enough, the pro-Conservative Daily Telegraph (aka Torygraph) sympathetically reports that Cameron

goes shooting on the 20,000-acre [Tarbert] estate [on the Scottish island of Jura], which is owned by his wife Samantha’s stepfather, Viscount Astor.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise, then, that Cameron also pledged to introduce a Bill to repeal the Hunting Act, which bans hunting with dogs, if the Conservative Party wins the next general election.

Guardian columnist Roy Hattersley summed it all up nicely.

No wonder Cameron urged his followers to “hug a hoodie”. He clearly identifies with young men who wear distinctive clothes as the badge of their incipient violence. Like members of the Bullingdon Club, the youths in cheap sweatshirts are a product of their environment. Those who become ruffians usually spring from families that have too little. The men in the royal blue tailcoats became hooligans because they had too much. Think what would have happened to the yobs of the club if a malign fairy had stolen them from their cradles and exchanged them with infants from a south London council estate. They would have become part of the Asbo generation. Smashing up restaurants would have led to prison, not to parliament.

The most offensive aspect of Cameron’s Bullingdon years is that he and his cronies were bought out of trouble by their rich families. They flaunted the idea that people with money can get away with anything. In 1963, after Alec Douglas-Home had become prime minister, Harold Wilson expressed his surprise that “at a time when even the MCC had ended the distinction between professionals and amateurs, the Conservatives have chosen to be led by a gentleman rather than a player”. Now, in an age when all the political parties claim to believe – for good or ill – in meritocracy, the Tories have chosen to be led by a man who was propelled onwards and upwards by family money.

Posted in Animal Rights | Tagged | Leave a comment

Trained Animal Performances by E.G.F.

A recent addition to the Stallwood Animal Rights Collection is a pamphlet, Trained Animal Performances, published by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

The author is only identified as “E.G.F.” This is most likely Captain E. G. Fairholme, O.B.E., the society’s chief secretary in the first decades of the 1900s. He coauthored with Wellesley Pain a history of the RSPCA, A Century of Work for Animals, which was published in 1924 by John Murray Ltd. A full-page advertisement on the back of the pamphlet states several statistics on the society’s “vast and varied work. Among the items of its record for the past year are the following” and goes onto list the number of convictions (3,963), cautions given (19,388) and complaints investigated (11,552). Also, the pamphlet gives the society’s address as 105 Jermyn Street, London SW1, which was the society’s headquarters from 1869 to 1973, when it relocated to Horsham, Sussex. All this leads me to conclude that the pamphlet was published in the early 1900s. Further research at the RSCPA library should be able to date its publication to a particular year.

I found various references to Captain Fairholme in titles in my collection. He becomes an intriguing figure and I fantasize about what it would be like to meet him.

For example, A W Moss refers three times to Fairholme in his history of the RSPCA, Valiant Crusade, and the captain’s work for horses. Fairholme was a member of a “special delegation” who visited ports in Belgium to document the live export trade of British horses for slaughter.

In 1909 the scandalous trade continued. The horses were required to walk–crawl might be a better term–four and a half miles from the docks at Antwerp to the abattoirs. Whilst these ghastly processions were passing, many Belgians pulled down their blinds and closed their shutters as a protest against the iniquity.

The next year a special deputation went to the Continental ports, with a representative from the Daily Mail. Captain Fairholme, who was one of their number, was assaulted by three men, who tried to trip him into the dock and seized his camera. His life was further threatened by those interested in the trade and strong representations were made to the Belgian police by the British Consul, who demanded the arrest of the three thugs and protection for the British representatives. Two of the gang who had made the attack were eventually arrested by the police, brought to court and sentenced. The stolen camera was recovered. As a result of the publicity involved, Sir George Greenwood was able to introduce a Bill and it became the Diseases of Animals Act (1910). Unfortunately, the original draft of the measure was altered in its passage through Parliament and the utility of the Act impaired by the omission of a few words that would have recognized the cruelties which the horses endured after being disembarked. Many hundreds of convictions were still being recorded against dealers in this trade.

What a sad commentary on what passes for humanity in that 100 years later it is still necessary for Compassion In World Farming to lead the fight against the live export trade of British animals for slaughter on the European mainland.

This comparison of today’s animal rights campaigns with our past is further reflected in Captain Fairholme’s Trained Animal Performances. For example, he frames the case as an issue of the animal’s labor in contrast to the labor of people.

The human worker, articulate with real or fancied wrongs, takes the law into his own hands and “downs tools” to draw public attention to his just or unjust demands. It is, he claims, the only remedy, even though this action may dislocate life for the general public and bring suffering and hardships to countless thousands who have no voice in the matter. Would to heaven that the animals could pursue a like course! The world would then be a different and a better place, for we should have learnt how dependent on the animal kingdom we human beings are. Think, for instance, if all the draught animals who are systematically overdriven and overloaded refused to leave their stables until the laws of our country were properly enforced! Where would our commerce be? How would our food be carried from the railways to the distributing centres and from the shops to the homes? It would certainly be a difficult time–but what a glorious change would result! And, to my mind, the first class of animals that should strike–physically, too–are the animals who are victimised with slow and constant torture, so that empty-headed thoughtless human beings (I had almost said asses, but that would be a deep insult to that humble and plucky animal) might have an hour’s amusement. Being inarticulate they cannot strike, without being brutally struck in return, and so they are forced to perform unnatural and degrading antics in order that their alien owners may “earn a living.” And it is mostly aliens who resort to such, to my mind, dishonest methods of gaining their daily living. This is a point which, at this time especially, should be remembered, for if we had strong laws to keep the aliens from our shores we should also, to an enormous extent, purge our public entertainments of these degrading spectacles of “trained animal performances.”[emphasis in original]

This extract is striking not only for its comparison of human and animal labor but also for its emphasis on blaming the problem of performing animals primarily on foreigners. While recognizing animal cruelty within its own shores, the British have always been particularly outraged by what happens to “our” animals when they go abroad. I don’t know if Captain Fairholme wrote this pamphlet before or after his trip to Belgium but it would be interesting to find out. All of this is so reminiscent of the present and the Battle of Brightlingsea when this small town’s population protested the shipment of live farmed animals through its port in the mid-1990s.

In his conclusion, Captain Fairholme tract is as contemporary in style and rhetorical flourish as any one of us might say today.

Now that we have the knowledge let it not be said that we lack the courage to act up to our convictions. Let us learn the lesson of trade unionism and band ourselves together so that we become a power in the land, and can, by refusing to witness and therefore encourage this particular form of cruelty, “strike” for those who are not capable themselves of using this powerful argument to right their wrongs.

Posted in Animal Rights | Tagged | Leave a comment