Operation Happy Sock

It's just not cats who could do with a little OHS from time to time.
The Grumpy Vegan can’t help but wonder that we’re all going to hell in a hand basket. What’s not to worry about? The Middle East. Lunatics running the asylum. Avian Bird Flu. Global Warming. The price of tofu.

But every now and then something comes along that even reaches through to touch the heart of this most jaded of souls.

Operation Happy Sock (OHS) is a brilliantly simple program that matches together Girl Guides, who ordinarily have nothing better to do than to help people, with the more urgent needs of cats in shelters. And OHS recycles, too!

You see, we’re all lost socks in the laundromat of time (with apologies to Biff) and we all have odd socks in our drawers. Send your odds socks to OHS and its founder, Martha Powers, will stuff ’em with a special catnip concoction and she will make sure that cats in cages will cuddle up with their very own Operation Happy Sock.

And this is where the Girl Guides come in. Bless ’em.

They have to do things to win Brownie Points. And what better way is there than making cats happy? Herndon, VA-based Girl Scout Troop 6388 collected unwanted socks from friends and family members and converted them into catnip toys by stuffing them with catnip and fiberfill, then tying a knot in the ankle. But instead of a local shelter the girls sent their OHS consignment to the PAWS shelter in Kuwait.

“Homeless cats deserve a little fun,” said troop leader Cheryl Marcey, “but we learned that many shelters have no budget for buying toys for the animals. When we heard about the PAWS shelter in Kuwait, we thought they were especially deserving.”

The Grumpy Vegan thinks it’s time for all of us to, er, step in. Let’s send catnip-filled socks to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and to the Hezbollah leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah. Methinks that there are quite few others who I would also like to send them to.

Don’t we all each need a Happy Sock to cuddle up with from time to time?

Posted in Animal Rights | Tagged | Leave a comment

Raw Vegan Caught Eating Nachos and Drinking Beer

In the same week that Michael Harris was prominently featured as a completely 100 percent raw vegan in Baltimore City‘s free weekly newspaper, he was fingered for eating nachos and drinking beer by his server who recognized him from the article.

Lyndsi Mayer, waitress at the Fells Point’s Waterfront Hotel, told the City Paper that the nachos, chicken wings and fish are all fried in the same “grease.” She confirmed that the nachos are “smothered with CHEESE […] from a moo-cow!”

Challenged, Harris demonstrated remarkable verbal dexterity worthy of any disgraced politician “100 percent vegan 90 percent of the time,” he said.

Now, you’re either vegan or you’re not. But there’s room for some latitude. (See Glossary for the Grumpy Vegan’s approach to veganism.) But nachos in a restaurant fried alongside dead chicken and fish parts and “smothered” with cheese is so obviously NOT vegan.

Posted in Eating | Tagged | Leave a comment

Canton’s Dog Park—Baltimore’s Own

Canton's Dog Park Even has T-shirts to Buy!
As founding president of the Canton Community Association (yes, the Grumpy Vegan does have a life) I, along with a dedicated team of volunteers, designed, created, installed, funded and managed Baltimore City’s first (and sadly still, only) dog park in our neighborhood.

A true dog park is a fenced area where dogs can run free and safely with their own kind.

The reason why all of this is mentioned is because the Baltimore Sun today published an astonishing editorial, “The Sniff Test,” in support of dog parks. “It’s good for the dogs, and it’s good for everyone else,” it proclaims.

Who’d a thought that the Sun’s editorial writers were Marxists?

“Dog owners of Baltimore get organized. The city needs you. Your dog needs you. You have nothing to lose buy your leashes – at least, inside the fence,” they wrote.

Posted in Animal Rights, The Grumpy Vegan Life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Walking Through an Open Door to Veganism

Kathleen Jannaway opened the door for the Grumpy Vegan-to-be to walk through.
When I returned to college for my last year from my summer vacation in a chicken slaughter house, I was keen to meet up with a girl friend in the year below who was the only vegetarian I knew at that time. I could not wait to play the machismo role of trying to make Amanda upset, even make her cry, at what I had been doing. Instead, we argued about everything to do with eating meat through to the end of the year. (That it was cruel. How could you put pieces of charred corpse in your body? And so on.) Consequently, I became a vegetarian on January 1, 1974. Adopting a vegetarian diet while taking a class in French cuisine and hotel and restaurant management is akin to converting to Judaism while studying at a Catholic seminary because you want to be a priest!

I had only another six months to go on my course. How was I to cook and taste meat if I was a vegetarian? “Fake it,” said Amanda. “Pretend you tasted it.” Notwithstanding some earnest experimentation with alcohol and drugs while I was at college, I knew I did not have to worry about being caught faking it because my teachers saw me as one of their best students and did not focus their attention on me. A report at the end of my first year stated that I was a “quite outstanding student in both ability and spirit.”

I was still living with my parents when I became a vegetarian. My mother’s response to my born again vegetarian proselytizing was, “Not in my home, you’re not!” This I interpreted as a fundamental challenge to my personal integrity. I was now a zealous vegetarian. I believed she should be a vegetarian, too. I would not accept that she could not see what I now saw.

Thirty plus years ago vegetarians were seen as harmless cranks. There was even a famous vegetarian restaurant in London called Cranks, which opened in Carnaby Street in the “swinging sixties.” It seemed that all of the vegetarian food stores that existed then were privately owned by well-meaning eccentrics. They sold “health foods.” My snobbish haute cuisine taste did not find whole foods very appealing as they were always brown, including the rice, flour, margarine and pasta. Organic food had yet to make much of an impact at this time. The nearest health food store to Camberley was in a nearby village. The shop was run by two elderly sisters. Even though it did not offer very much, you could enjoy a cooked vegetarian snack at a couple of tables in the corner. Mother and I were glad when a year or so later Holland & Barrett, a national chain of health food stores, opened in Camberley’s new pedestrian town center. She eventually worked there for many years. I always feel nostalgic whenever I visit a Holland & Barrett because they continue to sell many of the same products that I bought all those years ago.

Another independent health food store I particularly remember was in Blackpool, Lancashire. I was working for the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection at the time (mid-1980s) and represented them at the Labour Party’s annual conference in our “Putting Animals into Politics” campaign. The health food store owner had cut out salacious photographs of young women in bikinis, pasted them onto cardboard and placed them on the shelves. The implication was “Eat this can of red beans and you will look like her!” Or “Take this vitamin supplement and you will be able to seduce her!” (This will not be a surprise if you have been to Blackpool.) Today, whenever I visit a Whole Foods Market or even my local Safeway, I am amazed at the availability of vegan and organic food and products in comparison to the little that we had to choose from in the mid-1970s.

After much argument about why she should be a vegetarian, mother and I agreed to call a truce. She agreed to cook meat-based meals for father, Wendy (my sister) and herself, and cook vegetarian food separately for me. For example, every Sunday she would roast a chicken but cook the stuffing separately so that I could eat it. She would add an egg to the stuffing mix to make sure I got enough protein. Our knowledge of vegetarian nutrition was nonexistent. Mother was extremely accommodating to my dietary needs. She listened patiently to my opinionated outlook on the world. But I still believed she should be a vegetarian. Several months into the truce, I started up again. “You should be a vegetarian. You know you should be a vegetarian. Why aren’t you a vegetarian?”

To which she replied, “When was the last time you saw me eat meat?”

She had, of course, become a vegetarian some months earlier but never told me. She wanted me to see how long it would take for me to notice. I was, of course, too involved with myself and my self-righteousness to pay attention to what she did and did not eat. She remained a vegetarian, later becoming a vegan (father also some years later) until her premature death from cancer in 1986.

Toward the end of 1975 the British Broadcasting Corporation began an innovative series of community-based programs called “Open Door.” They selected a handful of organizations to help them make a program about themselves. The first one was by and about The Vegan Society. This was my second exposure to veganism and mother’s first. The program was broadcast twice and we watched it separately. (My determined drinking practices clashed with the first screening.) We later agreed that they had a point or two but we thought the vegans on the program were all rather, well, odd. Looking back, it was clearly original programming and an ambitious step for the Vegan Society to take. I subsequently got to know some of the vegans who appeared. They were, of course, not odd at all but dedicated pioneers. (Perhaps by then I had become odd, too.)

I am eternally grateful to Kathleen Jannaway who was the society’s secretary and played a prominent role in the program. She had a profound impact on many people through her indefatigable work for the society for many, many years. I know she helped to persuade me and mother to go vegan on January 1, 1976. Kathleen is a quintessentially English vegan that personifies a stoic determination. For example, who cannot help but resist the Vegan Society’s then advice (The Vegan, Vol. 23, No. 1, Spring, 1976, p. 24) on flatulence as just a “passing reaction” that the body will adapt to? Would it be too unkind for me to note that – 30 years on – the wind of change still passes somewhat controllably through me?

Posted in The Grumpy Vegan Life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Each Man Kills the Thing He Loves

Desktop Killing
All recreational animal killing is sneered at by the Grumpy Vegan but Internet hunting takes the, ur, bullet.

Hunting is an act of cowardice. Macho-wannabees dress up in camouflage drag to commune with nature by killing doves and deer. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, each man kills the thing he loves. It looks like some therapy is needed by someone somewhere.

So, it’s cheers to Louisiana for becoming the 22 state to ban Internet hunting but grumbles too because it’s one of only two states legalizing cock fighting. Time for Louisiana to take more steps toward compassion.

Posted in Animal Rights | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nationalism and Tradition

Nationalism and tradition conspire with profit to kill the seals.
Behind the curtain of so-called indigenous traditions involving the killing of animals lurks government subsidies and the stink of nationalism of the worst kind.

Let’s take a closer look at Japan’s commercial (sorry, scientific) whaling and the recent Canadian seal kill and Norway’s perennial support for it.

The Economist (June 17, 2006) points out that the Japanese whaling fleet is “heavily subsidized” by the government. (Sorry. The article can be accessed by web-only subscribers.)

True to form in The Economist’s no nonsense style it goes on to suggest that the Japanese whaling industry should be put on a “proper economic basis.” In other words, make it pay for itself without tax-payers subsidies. “Put whale-hunting rights up for auction, allowing both killers and conservationists to bid,” The Economist concludes. “The chances are that those who prefer whales to swim free would be able to outbid the few remaining humans who like eating them.”

Then there’s The HSUS‘s recent expose that a Norwegian company was paid about $330,000 by the Norwegian government to burn 10,000 excess Canadian harp seal skins.

Destroying unwanted seal pelts, of course, directly contradicts the claims of the Norwegian and Canadian governments that the Canadian seal kill is a viable economic proposition.

The Grumpy Vegan particularly dislikes nationalism (not much good ever comes of it) and tradition – particularly when it is used to justify animal cruelty. Nationalism and tradition compounded inevitably by the opportunity for some mercenary to make some money out of it are the reasons why much of today’s animal exploitation continues.

Posted in Animal Rights | Tagged | Leave a comment