Stupid Comment of the Day

If it wasn’t bad enough for a judge to find a monkey breeder not guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to a capuchin baby monkey because she was separated from her mother within days of birth

“If it is lawful to sell a capuchin monkey it must be lawful, at some point, to separate it from its family,” commented District Judge Richard Williams

it doesn’t help when an expert speaking in support of the prosecution (Dr. Alison Chromin, scientific director, Monkey World) says, “A primate is not a dog or a chicken or a duck, it is a social animal which lives for 40 years.”

Last time the Grumpy Vegan looked dogs, chickens and ducks were social animals too.

Posted in Moaning, Thinking | Tagged | Leave a comment

Women = uncovered meat?

The Guardian reports this morning on a Muslim cleric in Australia who compares uncovered women to exposed meat.

“If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside … without cover, and the cats come to eat it … whose fault is it, the cats’ or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab [the headdress worn by some Muslim women], no problem would have occurred.”

Posted in Eating, Moaning, Thinking | Tagged | Leave a comment

Animal Protection and Public Policy

The Grumpy Vegan was reading Jonathan Freedland’s op ed on climate change when it struck me that if you delete “climate change” and replace it with “commercial animal exploitation” it made my case that the single greatest challenge we face as animal advocates is making animal protection a mainstream political issue.

Whose job is it to stop climate change [commercial animal exploitation]? For a while, it’s seemed like it’s up to us, as individuals, to change our personal behaviour. […] But we should be careful: climate change [commercial animal exploitation] is too big a problem to be solved simply by virtuous individuals hopping on a bus instead of taking the car, or disconnecting the tumble dryer [going vegan as in our case], valuable though those moves are. This is one responsibility that can’t be saddled solely on activists and consumers. This is a job for government. […] It should be obvious that climate change [commercial animal exploitation] is not a discrete policy problem but an across-the-board threat to every aspect of our lives, if not our very survival.

Freedland goes on to discuss a speech on climate change and public policy given earlier in the week by Margaret Beckett, Britain’s first woman Foreign Secretary. She frames climate change as a defense issue, too.

“This is not just an environmental problem,” she said. “It is a defence problem. It is a problem for those who deal with economics and development, conflict prevention, agriculture, finance, housing, transport, innovation, trade and health.”

The same is true for commercial animal exploitation. For example, animals don’t produce food and animals don’t create healthy people. As the word’s resources (oil, water, crops) become increasingly restricted and expensive, commercial animal exploitation practices (e.g., factory farming and animal research), which uneconomically use these resources, also becomes increasingly uneconomic and commercially defensible.

It’s time for the animal rights/protection/welfare movement to wake up and understand that commercial animal exploitation is, of course, an issue to do with the cruel treatment of animals but it’s also an issue that affects people. It’s time we made this message loud and clear. Then, we will take a major step forward in making animal protection a mainstream political issue and secure effective legislation giving animals protection as well as helping ourselves.

Posted in Organising | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sign of the times?

Two interesting but seemingly unrelated articles in today’s press.

New York Times reports on the various efforts to market labelled “humane” meat and dairy products.

Forbes reports on Yerkes National Primate Reserch Center and its abondoment of a proposal for AIDS research on up to 100 endangered African monkeys.

Sign of the times? Yes. It’s a step forward when consumers are educated by business about how the animal products they consume are produced. How often do we learn about research laboratories declining to conduct animal testing?

Posted in Organising | Tagged | Leave a comment

The mccartney divorce

The McCartneys
It seems that because the McCartneys care about animals — shock! horror! — their divorce is particularly egregious. Mary Riddell and Marina Hyde write boring, predictable, stupid columns about the divorce and tediously write without any authority that this divorce is particularly bad because the McCartneys care — the Grumpy Vegan kids ye not — more about animals than people.

The McCartneys [writes Mary Riddell] have a mission to dispense the soya milk of human kindness to the furred and feathered across the globe. According to McCartney (the Grumpy Vegan asks which one? Shouldn’t we be told?), if people wish to save the planet, ‘all they have to do is stop eating meat.’ For such pious vegetarians, this is proving a very carnivorous divorce. A couple who would faint at the sight of a lamb cutlet are perceived as tearing bloody lumps out of one another in what is billed (the Grumpy Vegan asks by whom? Surely not Mary Riddell) as a parable of modern celebrity.

More worthy of note, perhaps, [writes Marina Hyde] are the limits of the couple’s compassion, which seems to confirm the truism that many bleeding-heart animal-rights sympathizers tend to run dry when it comes to humans. Both Heather and Paul are vociferous advocates for our furry, or scaly, or even eight-legged friends. Eating meat, Sir Macca once remarked (the Grumpy Vegan wants to know if this allegation can be attributed) to a dinner companion, is “like what Hitler did to the fucking Jews”, while Heather — a strident activist for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals – recently fronted a campaign against milk by a vegan group that maintains it causes cancer.

In two consecutive days, The Guardian and its sister-Sunday newspaper, The Observer, demonstrate that even two otherwise thoughtful newspapers can be guilty of publishing opinionated, ill-informed, pointless-other-than-to-appeal-to-base-prurient-emotions, appallingly written rubbish.

Posted in Moaning | Tagged | Leave a comment