More from the Allotment!

The compost pile can be seen above the two plots next to the fence. We fill up a plastic bucket a week with vegetable trimmings and peelings and tea bags and take it up to the allotment to add it to the compost pile.
Here’s an update on what’s latest at our allotment in Fernbank. We continued to clear the two 10′ x 12′ plots. The photo shows that the top plot is cleared and the bottom one is half-cleared. To clear these plots we have to cut off with a spade 2-3″ of compressed couch grass and roots. This is hard work and time consuming. The slice of grass, roots and some soil has to be moved to near the fence at the top end. Once the top is cleared the soil is dug over. The objective here is to clear the top layer and expose the soil and remove all the couch grass roots. The digging over exposes the soil to the air and wind, which will help to kill off the roots. We also bought some plastic that’s designed to put over the ground to kill off the grass and roots. The next steps are to finish off the remaining half of the bottom plot by removing the top layer and turn over the soil. Next, we lay the plastic over the two plots and weigh them down with the sods we dug up and this will help to kill off the remaining couch grass roots. We will lay out any remaining plastic near to the two plots to help start the process of killing off the grass in that area. Now the Grumpy Vegan can understand why people use chemicals!

Posted in Eating, The Grumpy Vegan Life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Thought for the Day

A San Francisco judge has ruled that chickens are not “livestock,” and, as a result, are not subject to the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, according to court filings. A lawsuit brought by the Humane Society of the United States against the Agriculture Department argued that USDA had misinterpreted the 50-year-old act.

“The court finds the legislative history strongly demonstrates unambiguous congressional intent that livestock, as used in the HMSA, does not include poultry,” U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel wrote in her opinion. Judge Patel granted summary judgment in USDA’s favor and dismissed the lawsuit.

HSUS’s argument was based on a 1958 dictionary definition of livestock that said that the word encompassed “useful” animals on a farm, while USDA said that the term livestock has always internally meant to exclude poultry.

“The plain language of these bills indicates that Congress intended to exclude poultry from the definition of livestock when it enacted H.R. 8308, the bill that eventually became the HMSA,” Patel wrote.

Judge Rules Poultry Are Not ‘Livestock’

Posted in Thinking | Tagged , , | Leave a comment